Various Roads, Maidstone in the Borough of Maidstone - Variation 49A: Waiting Restrictions

Consultation has concluded

This order is an Amendment to the below order (variation 49) due to a road name error.

The effect of this proposed Order would be to introduce or amend existing waiting restrictions on the following lengths of roads in Maidstone in the Borough of Maidstone:

  • Headingley Road – on the southwest from its junction with Maxwell Drive for a distance of 19 metres in a north westerly direction
  • Maxwell Drive – on the west side from its junction with Headingley Road for a distance of 19.5 metres in a south westerly direction

This proposed order is being made for the following reasons:

  • for avoiding danger to persons or other traffic using the road or any other road or for preventing the likelihood of any such danger arising
  • for preserving or improving the amenities of the area through which the road runs
  • for facilitating the passage on the road or any other road of any class of traffic (including pedestrians).

The scheme will be reviewed so that the Council can make the decision to make the Order permanent, amend or abandon it.

Full details, including the scheme plan, can be found in the Public Notice and Statement of Reason document.

Any person wishing to object or support the Order before it is made permanent can do so via our response form.

The effect of this proposed Order would be to introduce or amend existing waiting restrictions on the following lengths of roads in Maidstone (double yellow lines waiting to be prohibited at any time):-

  • Ash Grove – on the southwest side between points 19 metres east and 19 metres west of its junction with Maxwell Drive
  • Howard Drive – on the northeast side between points 19 metres northwest and 20.5 metres southeast
  • Maple Avenue – (1) on the northeast side from a point in line with the boundary of 38/40 Maple Avenue in a northwest direction following the kerb line around the turning head then a southeast direction to a point in line with the boundary of 31/33 Maple Avenue including the circumference of the central island (2) single Yellow Line Mon-Fri 8-9am and 3-4pm on both sides from the boundary of 2/4 Maple Avenue for its entire length to join up with the above proposed DYLs
  • Maxwell Drive – (1) on both sides of its junction with Howard Drive for a distance of 21.5 metres in a north easterly direction (2) on both sides of its junction with Ash Grove for a distance of 19.5 metres in a south westerly direction.

This order is being made for the following reasons:

  • for avoiding danger to persons or other traffic using the road or any other road or for preventing the likelihood of any such danger arising
  • for preserving or improving the amenities of the area through which the road runs
  • for facilitating the passage on the road or any other road of any class of traffic (including pedestrians).

This order is an Amendment to the below order (variation 49) due to a road name error.

The effect of this proposed Order would be to introduce or amend existing waiting restrictions on the following lengths of roads in Maidstone in the Borough of Maidstone:

  • Headingley Road – on the southwest from its junction with Maxwell Drive for a distance of 19 metres in a north westerly direction
  • Maxwell Drive – on the west side from its junction with Headingley Road for a distance of 19.5 metres in a south westerly direction

This proposed order is being made for the following reasons:

  • for avoiding danger to persons or other traffic using the road or any other road or for preventing the likelihood of any such danger arising
  • for preserving or improving the amenities of the area through which the road runs
  • for facilitating the passage on the road or any other road of any class of traffic (including pedestrians).

The scheme will be reviewed so that the Council can make the decision to make the Order permanent, amend or abandon it.

Full details, including the scheme plan, can be found in the Public Notice and Statement of Reason document.

Any person wishing to object or support the Order before it is made permanent can do so via our response form.

The effect of this proposed Order would be to introduce or amend existing waiting restrictions on the following lengths of roads in Maidstone (double yellow lines waiting to be prohibited at any time):-

  • Ash Grove – on the southwest side between points 19 metres east and 19 metres west of its junction with Maxwell Drive
  • Howard Drive – on the northeast side between points 19 metres northwest and 20.5 metres southeast
  • Maple Avenue – (1) on the northeast side from a point in line with the boundary of 38/40 Maple Avenue in a northwest direction following the kerb line around the turning head then a southeast direction to a point in line with the boundary of 31/33 Maple Avenue including the circumference of the central island (2) single Yellow Line Mon-Fri 8-9am and 3-4pm on both sides from the boundary of 2/4 Maple Avenue for its entire length to join up with the above proposed DYLs
  • Maxwell Drive – (1) on both sides of its junction with Howard Drive for a distance of 21.5 metres in a north easterly direction (2) on both sides of its junction with Ash Grove for a distance of 19.5 metres in a south westerly direction.

This order is being made for the following reasons:

  • for avoiding danger to persons or other traffic using the road or any other road or for preventing the likelihood of any such danger arising
  • for preserving or improving the amenities of the area through which the road runs
  • for facilitating the passage on the road or any other road of any class of traffic (including pedestrians).
  • CLOSED: This survey has concluded.

    Please complete this form to object or support this TRO

    We recommend that you read the full Public Notice before completing this form. This is available from the Documents section.  

    Please ensure that you submit your response so that your views are taken into account. 

    Privacy: Kent County Council collects and processes personal information in order to provide a range of public services. Kent County Council respects the privacy of individuals and endeavours to ensure personal information is collected fairly, lawfully, and in compliance with the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation. Read the full Traffic Regulation Order Privacy Notice.

    Consultation has concluded
  • CLOSED: This survey has concluded.

    Please complete this form to object or support this TRO

    We recommend that you read the full Public Notice before completing this form. This is available from the Documents section.  

    Please ensure that you submit your response so that your views are taken into account. 

    Privacy: Kent County Council collects and processes personal information in order to provide a range of public services. Kent County Council respects the privacy of individuals and endeavours to ensure personal information is collected fairly, lawfully, and in compliance with the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation. Read the full Traffic Regulation Order Privacy Notice.

    Consultation has concluded